Light Pollution Is Out Of Control. Streetlights are only part of the problem.

By: Jan Hattenbach June 25, 2025 in Sky & Telescope and Laurie Winkless, July 23, 2025, Contributor at Forbes Magazine.

Walking through neighborhoods, volunteers identified sources of light pollution —surprisingly, streetlights weren’t the main culprit. New research reveals many previously underappreciated sources of light pollution.

Berlin at night. Image Science & Analysis Laboratory / NASA Johnson Space Center

​If you’ve noticed your night sky becoming brighter over recent years, you’re not imagining things: Studies from the ground suggest that the amount that artificial light spills into the atmosphere is increasing by 10% year over year. We were supposed to see the opposite effect. Yet conversion of streetlights to energy-efficient LEDs, often fully shielded to direct light toward the ground, somehow weren’t doing the trick.

​Using a simple app — and the help of hundreds of citizen scientists — a research group led by Christopher Kyba (Ruhr University Bochum, Germany) has found out the cause of this discrepancy. Publicly controlled streetlights only make up only a small percentage of contaminating light sources. The vast majority of light-pollution sources are private and commercial windows and signs, which so far have hardly been studied, let alone regulated.

This screenshot from the Nachtlichter app shows an area in the city of Potsdam (near Berlin); blue highlights streets that volunteers surveyed in 2021, while yellow highlights streets surveyed in 2023. The app is not available on the App store or in Google Play, but only directly from the Nachtlichter website. Nachtlichter

“Policies on energy and lighting as well as research on the effect of artificial light on the environment have generally focused on street lighting,” Kyba writes in Nature Cities, published on June 16th. “Our results indicate that a broader approach that takes all lighting into account will be needed to understand and to mitigate the environmental effects of light from cities.”   

​To match satellite images of cities at night with actual light sources on the ground, the team designed an app called Nachtlichter (“night lights” in German). About 250 citizen scientists used it to count and classify all light sources they could find as they walked along streets, paths, and alleys in predetermined areas in Germany. The surveyed areas included city centers, residential neighborhoods, dense commercial and industrial zones, and villages.

The Nachtlichter app has users put light sources into one of 18 different categories. Team Nachtlichter / Nature Cities 2025 / CC BY 4.0

During the autumn of 2021, the users registered a total of 234,044 individual lights over the course of more than 4,400 surveys. The team then compared these counts with nighttime satellite imagery — specifically, visible- and near-infrared-light images taken by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Day-Night Band instrument aboard the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership satellite. The scientists used that comparison to translate the radiance as seen from above into the number of lights on the ground.

​They use this conversion to interpret satellite observations of other areas. For example, Kyba’s team estimates there are  2.5 million light sources that are on in the city of Berlin, and close to 80 million light sources for all of mainland Germany. That’s about one light source per inhabitant.

Low-resolution satellite imagery (at left) and aerial photography (at center and right) can identify light source location but not type. (The center frame shows aerial photography of the area outlined in red in the left frame.) Team Nachtlichter / Nature Cities 2025 / CC BY 4.0

The team also discussed the types of lighting present in the surveyed areas. Surprisingly, streetlights only made up 10.3% of all the light sources. Many (48.2%) were illuminated private windows, and commercial windows added another 7.4%. Other source types made up the remaining 18%, including illuminated signs, floodlights, facade illuminations, video screens, decorative lights, and illuminated house numbers and door bells.

This result explains the discrepancy between satellite images and perceived skyglow: By focusing on public streetlights, almost half of which are full shielded in Germany, researchers ignore that most light pollution comes from other sources. In addition, satellite images, often taken around local midnight, miss a lot of private and commercial lighting that’s present during the evening hours. (This reasoning may also explain why images taken by Earth-observing satellites see a more moderate increase in light pollution than measured from the ground: just 2% yearly.)

The result may help explain why the conversion of public lighting to LED failed to decrease skyglow, as had been expected due to previous studies. Any improvement in public lighting may have been overwhelmed by a simultaneous increase in other light sources’ number and intensity. 

​Kyba’s team concludes that lighting policies should therefore target commercial lighting. Over a quarter of illuminated signs in commercial areas were reported as exceptionally bright by the volunteers, suggesting that regulations, mostly enacted decades before LED took over, may need to be updated. The team names France as a positive example, where new regulation requires advertising and interior lights to be turned off when there’s low pedestrian traffic and low building occupation, respectively.

This map shows the regions in Germany that were surveyed by Nachtlichter users. Team Nachtlichter / Nature Cities 2025 / CC BY 4.0

There’s still more work to be done: Because the team focused on Germany, the results cannot be easily extrapolated to other places. That’s because even countries of similar wealth and development can have dramatically different light emissions per capita when observed from space. A 2019 study, for example, found that the U.S. emits three times more light into space than Europe, and even in Europe there is large variation between different nations.

Secondly, the study only registered the number of sources and not their individual contribution to skyglow. The scattering of light overhead will differ for an illuminated sign compared to a fully shielded lamp, for example. Therefore, it doesn’t really tell us how much skyglow each source type generates, Kyba says: “What I think we can say is that streetlights become less important, the more dense and brighter a region is. In rural areas and suburbs, the relative contribution of streetlights to skyglow (especially late at night) is larger than it is for city centers.”

Future surveys in and outside of Germany may fill some of these gaps. The Nachtlichter team already undertook a second campaign in 2023 on the same roads and neighborhoods but at different hours during the night. Another campaign is also planned in Ireland.

The light pollution problem is set to spiral out of control, unless sharper and more effective tools are found to mitigate its effects. Finding out who and what actually pollutes most is a crucial step toward that goal.

Artificial light from homes, businesses, and other sources play a major role in brightening the night sky. San Francisco at night.

---

It’s becoming increasingly clear that excessive or inappropriate use of artificial lighting at night (ALAN) has widespread implications for ecological health. It can confuse and endanger nocturnal species who are active at night. Migratory birds and bats are diverted and disoriented by the presence of artificial lighting on their routes, with many killed as a result of colliding with brightly-lit structures. Other species including frogs change their breeding behaviors. A study published last month that looked at 7 years of VIIRS data from 428 Northern Hemisphere cities concluded that artificial light may be lengthening the growing season in urban environments by as much as 3 weeks compared to rural areas.

Humans are also not immune from ALAN’s influence, though it can be challenging to separate it out from that of other environmental factors. Unsurprisingly, it has been shown to disrupt our circadian rhythms (the 24-ish hour cycles that regulate how our bodies function, including our wake-sleep cycle). These disruptions, in turn, have been linked to an elevated risk of cardiovascular diseases, chronic stress, and depression. Chronic, long-term, regular, or cumulative exposure to ALAN may even be a risk factor for certain cancers and neurodegenerative diseases.

Put simply, too much light at night is bad for everyone. And as these (and many other) studies show, most of the light polluting our night skies has nothing to do with safety on our roads and streets. It’s mostly about advertising and poorly mounted floodlights, and to a much, much lesser extent, people not closing their curtains.

The solutions are relatively simple and numerous. As a start: Avoid lighting up places that don’t actually need to be lit. Where light is needed, be more intentional about what type, how much, and its location. Use timers or motion sensors to enable lights-out periods.

​Light pollution is serious. More cities need to start treating it as such.

Los Angeles at night.